Legislative Action
Click Here
To Connect To The Legislative Action Center

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
May 20th Legislative Update
Budget
Action or Inaction
IFB & CCFB communicated to
the General Assembly regarding the organizations legislative priority. We
support the development of a FY 2009 appropriation for agricultural programs
that maintains funding at adequate levels to provide for the sufficient
execution of agricultural programs. We also respectfully request that this be
done within the current revenue stream provided to the State. We did share the
wish for increased funding in several of the agricultural pass-through programs
like U of I Extension, SWCDs, Ag Education, etc.
We also indicated our support for adequate funding and staffing for key programs
within the Illinois Department of Agriculture. Three of our top areas within
the operating budget of the Illinois Department of Agriculture that need funding
at a minimum of the FY 2008 appropriated levels are:
Ø
The
Warehouse and Ag Product Inspection Bureau that administer compliance of
licensed grain dealers and warehouses with the Illinois Grain Code,
Ø
The Bureau
of Environment that need funds to provide the necessary testing for pesticide
applicators and other programs, and
Ø
The Meat
and Poultry Inspection staff that insure the quality of meat and eggs and allow
livestock producers avenues to market.
Also we clarified that Christian County Farm Bureau supports funding the
appropriations for agricultural programs within the current revenue streams of
the state. It was respectfully stated we have strong concerns about and do not
support any agricultural or natural resource fee increases. Those fees go into
special funds, which have been collected and transferred into the general
revenue fund, and were not used on purposes for which they were collected.
The Senate will most likely propose and pass a budget similar to the form of the
past several years. There will be just one operating budget and one capital
budget. We anticipate the budget to be very close to the current FY 2008
appropriated levels.
In the end it is expected that each chamber will pass a budget with simple
majority votes along partisan lines. We anticipate the House will not consider
the Senate’s and vice versa. Ultimately no budget will be adopted by the May
scheduled adjournment. That leads to the Constitutional requirement that a bill
passed after May 31st is required to have a 3/5 vote.
There is cautious optimism by some members of the General Assembly that a budget
will be adopted by the end of May. After last year, the State Legislative Staff
is taking a more realist approach that it will take some time for everything to
come together. Then there is the unknown of what the Governor will do with a
spending bill that hits his desk.
The Clean Car Act - Vehicle Emission Standards of
California – HB 3424 (Rep. May), SB 663 (Sen.
Link) and SB 2238 (Sen. Link)
HB 3424 provides that the Environmental Protection Agency shall propose and the
Pollution Control Board shall establish by rule a Clean Car Program that is (i)
authorized by Section 177 of the federal Clean Air Act, and (ii) applicable to
vehicles of the 2011 model year and every subsequent model year.
In effect, the bill will place the California Low Emissions Vehicle Program (CA
LEV) in Illinois Statute and Administrative Rules.
The bills sponsor Rep. May and the proponents continue to push hard for the
passage of this bill. They have been tenacious in their pursuit and are trying
to split the opposition coalition. Please let your legislators know of the
impact this will have if it is passed.
The following information outlines Christian County Farm Bureau's opposition to
HB 3424.
Adoption of the Clean Car Act will:
- Compromise Illinois'
promotion of renewable fuels and flex fuel vehicles
- Limit vehicle choice for
Illinois consumers - particularly by limiting the availability of light trucks
and SUVs
- Cede Illinois' regulatory
authority to California - a state that is vastly different, has not shown
Illinois' commitment to ethanol, and has no accountability to Illinois
residents
Currently:
- Illinois has 175 E85
pumps - 168 are retail E85 pumps accessible by the public - 2 additional are
planned
- California has 7 E85
pumps - 2 are retail E85 pumps accessible by the public - 5 additional are
planned
- 12 states have adopted
California's program. Of the 12 states that have adopted the California
program:
Ø
12 have less
than 20 E85 pumps
Ø
10 have less
than 10 E85 pumps
Ø
5 have 0 E85
pumps
- There are 22 Flexible
Fuel Vehicle models offered in the United States at this time. All 22 models
may be used in Illinois. Only 13 models may be used in California.
The provisions of the Clean
Car Act bills have also been included in Global Climate Change bills that make
many environmental changes above and beyond the Clean Car Act Provisions. CCFB
opposes HB 3424, SB 663 and SB 2238. HB 3424 is on 2nd reading in the House.
SB 663 is in Senate Rules Committee. and SB 2238 is in Senate rules committee
after the sponsor chose not to move the bill out of Environment and Energy
Committee.
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
***FEDERAL ACTION ALERT***May
12, 2008***
Please contact your U.S. Representative and your U.S. Senators to request their
support of the passage of the farm bill conference report.
This bill
includes a necessary safety net for a farmer that is very important to manage
risk during periods of poor production and low prices. (The current structure
of the safety net includes direct payments, counter-cyclical payments and the
marketing loan program. In 2009, an Average Crop Revenue Election program will
be offered and this will be the first effort for a revenue based safety net.)
This bill will
assist both consumers and farmers with substantial increases for nutrition
program funding while providing farmers with a production safety net.
Conservation
programs have been enhanced along with renewable energy and international food
aid programs. The farm bill provides programs that are important to every
district in Illinois.
This bill
implements key reforms for farm program payment limitations.
Some of those
reforms include:
•Individuals with more than $500,000 in 3-year Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) of
off-farm income will be ineligible to receive direct payments.
•Individuals with more than $750,000 in 3-year AGI of farm income will be
ineligible to receive direct payments.
•Direct attribution is required and the three-entity rule is eliminated.
•Individuals with more than $1,000,000 in 3-year AGI would be ineligible for
conservation payments unless two thirds of that money comes from farming.
•Limits are placed on how much farm loss can be carried over to offset
non-farm losses for tax purposes for wealthy Americans.
Increased
spending for the conservation title by $4.5 billion, including additional
funding for working lands programs, is also included.
$2.4 billion in
additional funds for Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP).
$1.1 billion in
additional funds for the Conservation Stewardship Program.
Nutrition title
funding increases by $10.3 billion.
In addition to increased food stamp benefits, this title also increase funding
for the school snack program by more than $1 billion.
More than $1.3
billion in new mandatory funding is provided to specialty crops. The bulk of
this funding is in the form of block grants to states, but other provisions
include technical assistance for specialty crops, farmer’s market promotion, and
organic certification cost share.
The bill scores
at $10 billion over the budget baseline, but is fully off-set with customs user
fees, which has been deemed an acceptable off-set by House and Senate Democrats
and Republicans. The White House disapproves of the use of this off-set because
they want to use it for other legislative priorities, but they have recognized
that it is NOT a tax increase.
******************************************
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE-JULY 3RD
SPECIAL SESSION!!!!
The Governor is
calling the members of the General Assembly back into Special Session on July
9th and 10th. He will ask them to pass all the revenue items he is seeking to
“balance the budget.” The largest of the revenue enhancements the Governor is
calling for passage is the capital construction package (details of the package
are listed on page 4 below). Also included in his request is legislation that
will grant broad authority for the Governor to “sweep” dedicated/special funds
at his discretion.
The best way to
explain what the Governor’s intentions is to use exact statements from his press
release:
“On July 9, the
Governor will convene a special session of the General Assembly to address the
revenue bills necessary to balance the budget, including the Hastert-Poshard
Illinois Works Capital plan which will put 600,000 Illinoisans to work and to
pass fund transfer legislation that would free up $530 million to support
spending. If the House does not act on July 9, the Governor will issue a second
proclamation for July 10 to take action on any budget balancing steps he must
take.”
The Governor
also said, “If the House fails to act on July 9, I will be forced to take all
action necessary to eliminate the $2 billion budget deficit. I will not take
those actions lightly, and will only act when it becomes abundantly clear that
the House can’t or won’t act responsibly on its own, adding that lawmakers would
be acting irresponsibly if they override the vetoes.”
NO STATE BUDGET (Again)
What is
becoming a common practice during the Blagojevich administration no state budget
is in place at the beginning of the fiscal year is happening again. The short
and simple of it is that the state fiscal year started yesterday, July 1st,
without the budget being approved.
The
appropriation bills were approved on May 31st, but were not officially sent to
the Governor until June 30th (the Illinois Constitution allows the General
Assembly 30 days from the passage of a bill to send it to the Governor to allow
for proofing and processing). The Governor has 60 days from the day he receives
them to take action.
Last Wednesday
the Governor’s office released their proposed cuts (as reported in
FarmWeek, June 30, 2008) to “balance” the budget.
In that announcement there were $18 million in agricultural cuts, of which
Cooperative Extension, agricultural research, Soil and Water Conservation
Districts, Illinois Grape & Wine industry support,
AgriFIRST, AgrAbility, and county fairs all
saw proposed funding cuts.
So what does
this mean? The first major fiscal deadline is the cutting of employee payroll
checks which begins on July 10th. If there is no budget approved by that date
many state employees (approximately 4,900) will not get paid. If it is not
approved by the following week approximately 8,200 more employees will not be
paid.
A second major
impact of no approved state spending authorization is that programs dependent on
state funding or businesses providing services to the State will also not get
paid. Already $1.3 billion in Medicaid bills remains unpaid from the previous
budget year that still have to be paid. State law[1]
allows Medicaid expenses of health care providers to be incurred in one year,
but paid out of a subsequent year. So the state has an additional $1.3 billion
shortfall from last year according to Comptroller Hynes’ office.
Couple the $1.3
billion of unpaid Medicaid bills with what the Governor says is a $2 billion
budget shortfall and we have a state budget short fall of at least $3.3
billion. To put that in perspective the State of Illinois has estimated a total
of $33.4 billion in FY 2008 in General Revenue Funds. That means the current
tentative FY 2009 State budget is approximately 9.8% over what was collected
last year. Of course there are estimates that new revenue generation for the
State in FY 2009 will be about $1 billion which translates into an overall short
fall of $2.3 billion.
What Do We Expect To See?
The House and
Senate will convene in Special Session on the 9th. We anticipate that the House
will make several public moves to see that the revenue bills for the capital
construction plan are not called or defeated and we expect the same for the fund
sweep legislation.
Once that is
done we fully expect, as outlined in the Governor’s press release today, that
the Governor will release his vetoes sometime late on the 9th or early the 10th
and call the General Assembly back in to deal with those on the 10th. We
anticipate that the Governor will use his pen to form some type of veto message
that will make the cuts he promised last week. The Governor has several veto
options he can use. He can use a total veto, line item veto, or reduction
veto. There was discussion over the past several weeks that he may use his
total veto on the FY 2009 budget, which would cause a huge government shut down
similar to last year.
A line item
veto allows the Governor to eliminate a single appropriation line in the budget
in its entirety. To restore this item requires a three-fifths vote in both
chambers.
A reduction
veto allows the Governor to reduce the appropriation level of any single
spending line item to a level he recommends. The reduced appropriation can be
restored to its full amount by a majority vote in both chambers. If the reduced
appropriation is not restored to its original level, the lower level created by
the Governor becomes law.
Please note
that when the line item veto or the reduction veto is used, only those specific
items in the Governor’s message are impacted. All other spending measures
become law and allow for immediate spending of those amounts. If the Governor
were to use his traditional total veto all the budget would be denied and a
total shut down could be enacted.
We are thinking
he will use a combination of line item and reduction veto. There was some
speculation last week that the Governor may use his total veto and force another
budget fight similar to last year. But with what has transpired today, we feel
the combination of line item and reduction vetoes will be used.
Now the
question arises what if the House and/or Senate do not take action on the
Governor’s line item or reduction vetoes on July 10th? If this were to occur
the appropriations not vetoed would become law, the items that have the
reduction veto used could most likely operate up to the amount the Governor
reduces them to, and the items that are eliminated by his line item veto would
be frozen until action of the General Assembly is taken.
We are not
clear as to what the House and Senate will do once these vetoes are issued.
Will they attempt to override the vetos, accept the
vetoes, or do nothing? The past several years have given us great practice in
dealing with the unknown, and we simply have to work within the current
political environment to the best of our abilities to protect the viability of
production agriculture in the long term.
Would another
round of Special Sessions be called this summer? Political “buzz” currently
around State House is that it will not likely happen. The reason for this is
because of the upcoming national Presidential Conventions (to which many of the
General Assembly members are delegates), and upcoming elections (it is typical
for state caucus legislative staffs to take a leave of absence to campaign and
this is already occurring, and leaves a skeleton crew to staff the General
Assembly process). Also the Compensation Review Board recommendation for salary
increases for legislators will occur unless affirmatively stopped by the Senate
before the election (there are several in Senate Democrat leadership who wish to
see the salary adjustment enacted).
******************************************
CCFB LEGISLATIVE UPDATE-APRIL 22ND
AG FUNDING FREEZE HEARING-FULL SUMMARY
In order to
address the Governor's decision to freeze more than $40 million in funds for
Agricultural programs, 33 House and Senate Ag Committee and Senate
Appropriations Committee members met to hear testimony from the impacted
organizations as well as testimony from the Governor's Office of Management and
Budget.
The following
groups testified at the hearing, Extension Partners, 4-H, Association of
Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Council on Food and Agricultural
Research, AgrAbility, Illinois Grape Growers and
Vintners, AFSCME Employee's Union, Illinois Fertilizer and Chemical Association
on behalf of the Fertilizer Research & Education Committee, Nature
Conservency, and Glenview Park District.
Each of these
groups gave brief but impassioned testimony explaining the need for the Governor
to release the money that was appropriated to them and the consequences if they
do not receive these funds. Many of these groups are facing extensive layoffs
or possibly closure of entire offices.
After the
groups made their case, the Governor's Office of Management & Budget was called
before the committee to explain their reasons for not releasing these funds and
to answer questions from the committee members. This was the moment that many
of the committee members had been waiting for. This was the show that the
audience was waiting for and they weren’t disappointed.
Ginger
Ostro, from the Office of Management & Budget, sat
in front of the frustrated legislators and outlined the reasons for the
predicament. Once her opening comments were complete, questions were fired one
right after another and typical of budget type hearings, the Governor’s office
answers were carefully crafted and most often not satisfactory to the Committee
members or the audience. Bottom line, the main reason was that realized tax
revenues were much lower than those predicted.
Rep. Bill Black
asked a question as to why the funds for FREC weren’t being released because
they are not appropriated and are currently sitting in their account and could
be released at any time. Ostro danced around the
question which only infuriated Rep. Black. After raising his tone, as only Rep.
Black can, and asking again and again why these funds aren’t being released,
Ostro continued to dodge the question and Rep. Black
slammed his microphone into the desk.
Committee
members continued to fire question after question at the Office of Management
and Budget. Ostro said that they would look at the
Agriculture funding and that they would be willing to work with the legislators
to take a closer look at this issue.
In the end, the
hearing was much appreciated by the agricultural and conservation participants
and much appreciation was shown to the legislators that participated and made
the hearing possible. CCFB & IFB will continue to work with all involved to
garner action on the part of the Governor’s office to release the funds.
The battle will
be a lengthy one that will test the will of all involved.
We are encouraging continued involvement by the
interested parties to keep the pressure on the Governor's Office.
So the question is what is the next step?
We would encourage that letters to the editors of your local and regional news
papers be sent on the impact that these cuts will have in your county. We need
to remain vigilant in letting the entire populace know that these programs are
vital for the future of agriculture.
COAL BED METHANE & DRILLING OPERATIONS ACT-SB 2079
After several
negotiation sessions hosted by Senate Haine, the
bill has been amended with language that contains an agreed amendment by IFB and
the Oil and Gas Association. The amendment explicitly adds
coalbed methane to the Drilling Operations Act to insure that
coalbed methane wells clearly have to follow the
Act. It also increases notification by drilling operators of potential drilling
on their property. The notification requirements will increase from 8 days
direct/personal notification and 10 days by mail,
to 15 days notification for both methods.
SB 2079 passed the Senate with 53 yes and 0 no votes and is now on 1st reading
in the House.
YOUTH EDUCATOR RESTORATION-SB 1921 & HB 4228
Seeks the
restoration of the University of Illinois Extension Services Youth Educator
funding levels to FY 2008 budget level.
This will restore the 29 youth educators that were eliminated by the Governor’s
Line Item Veto in the FY 2008 state budget. CCFB & IFB supports SB 1921 and HB
4228. SB 1921 is being held in the Senate Rules Committee and HB 4228 has
passed the House and is in the Senate Rules Committee
TRACTORS DRIVING ON HIGHWAY SHOULDERS-HB 4251
Provides that
the restrictions on driving a vehicle on the shoulder of a highway do not apply
to any farm tractor or implement of husbandry.
The Illinois Mid-West Truckers Association opposes the bill and the Illinois
Road Contractors Association has requested the bill to be amended to not apply
in construction zones for safety reasons. We support HB 4251 as introduced.
The bill passed the House 108-0-0 and is currently referred to Rules Committee
in the Senate.
Click on these links. . .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE-MARCH 10, 2008
SB 2079- SENATOR HAINE
COALBED METHANE
This bill has been assigned to the Senate Environment & ENERGY COMMITTEE
This requires
coal bed methane operators to justly compensate landowners and owners of rural
property when private property is being drilled upon in the absence of an
agreement with the landowner. There are four components to the bill. They are:
1) increases the notice to a land owner before a well is to be installed is
increased from 8 days to 30 days, 2) address the lack of compensation for
damages to the surface, 3) adds that a landowner may recoup the cost of attorney
fees and appraisal costs when calculating the value of the surface land, and 4)
clarifies that the Drilling Operations Act applies to
coalbed methane gas. The Illinois Oil and Gas Association adamantly
oppose this legislation. We strongly support it!
Depending on
where, your legislators may differ. Click on
http://www.farmbureaunews.com/action.htm and scroll towards the bottom of
the page, you will find the contact information for your legislators. Call your
legislator and encourage them to support Senator Haine’s
Bill on COALBED Methane.
HOUSE TO HOLD TRAVELING STATEWIDE HEARINGS TO HEAR ABOUT BUDGET
The House of
Representatives have scheduled 19 hearings across the state to give community
leaders, business owners, labor officials, service providers, advocacy
organizations, health care facilities, school districts, colleges and local
residents an opportunity to share their views about state budget funding
priorities, ways to reduce costs and means to improve government efficiency. We
would encourage any one interested in providing testimony to please do so.
The main topics
for agriculture that should be
addressed are:
-
Seek the
restoration of the University of Illinois Extension Services Youth Educator
funding levels to FY 2007 budget levels or greater. This will restore the 29
youth educators that were eliminated by the Governor’s Line Item Veto in the
FY 2008 state budget.
-
Support SB
1921 (Sen. Sullivan) and HB 4228 (Rep. Gordon) that restore $1.72 million for
the current State Budget year.
29 4-H Youth
Educators will lose their jobs in June if this funding is not restored.
The 29 Youth
Educators serve 47 counties.
-
Provide that
grant programs like Soil and Water Conservation Districts,
Agrability, Extension, C-FAR, and other programs
see the appropriated dollars in the current FY 2008 budget released. Each of
these programs is feeling the fiscal stress of their funds being held. SWCD
are estimating that if full funding is not released in the next several weeks
numerous local SWCD offices will have to be closed.
One of the
closer hearings to Christian County will be hosted on March 18th at
6:00 p.m. in Champaign at Parkland College, RM D244.
HB 4696 & SB 2861[Renewable Fuels]
Provides
enhancements and funding for the development of infrastructure for renewable
fuels production and distribution.
This legislation was developed in cooperation between the Illinois Corn Growers
Association, Illinois Soybean Association and the Illinois Farm Bureau.
There are four
major components to the legislation:
Renewable Fuel Production
-Facilities
- There are currently as many as seven proposed biofuel
production facilities that have requested support through the Illinois Renewable
Fuels Development program at the Department of Commerce and Economic Development
(DCEO). There are not sufficient funds available at this time. These
facilities have, or are in the process of negotiating, Project Labor Agreements
(as required to qualify for the grant funds) with various trades and labor
locals in the vicinity of their proposed plants. There are six to eight more
facilities nearing that point of the pre-construction process. The legislation
will provide $30 Million in FY09 to FY10 ($15 Million in FY11 and after) for
grants for renewable fuel production facilities.
-Rail Infrastructure
– Until now, existing infrastructure systems were sufficient to meet the needs
of renewable fuel production, distribution and handling of co-products from
Illinois renewable fuel facilities. That structure is no longer capable of
meeting the needs of the growing renewable fuels industry. One of Illinois’
greatest advantages over other states in renewable fuel production is the fact
that we are served by all major rail systems in the nation, allowing our
products to move in virtually any direction to any market. The legislation
calls for $5 Million annually for five years.
The
legislation provides two major improvements to assist in providing rail
infrastructure. 1) Increase rail spur options at production facilities as well
as increase rail storage/collection facilities on each railway mainline system
allowing unit trains to be assembled more efficiently to allow moving products
to market faster. 2) Assist in the creation of at least one container loading
facility on each mainline system allowing movement and shipping of co-products
to market.
-E-85 Pumps
– Two matching grant programs will be created to assist in the installation of
E-85 fuel pumping stations. The first will provide matching grants to filling
stations for the installation of E-85 pumps. Each fueling station company will
be eligible for matching grants of 50% of the construction of facilities for
three stations per year, not to exceed a total of $250,000 annually. The second
matching grant program will be for units of local
governments that wish to install a centralized E-85 pump. Each unit of local
government would be eligible for a 50% matching grant not to exceed $40,000.
The total funds available are $3.5 million annually.
-Competitive Commercialization
Programs
- This program will coordinate various efforts and bring focus to the ultimate
goal of placing Illinois at the front of renewable fuel commercialization
process. The Competitive Commercialization Program would be administered under
the auspices of the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity
with input from an advisory group made up of 11 members. The advisory group
would have representatives appointed by each of the four legislative leaders,
the Director of DCEO, a general statewide agricultural association
representative, a soybean producer’s representative, a corn producer’s
association representative, 2 representatives from organized labor and a
representative of renewable fuels production facilities. $1 million annually
would be made available for this program.
Tractors Driving on Highway Shoulders – HB 4251 (Rep. Bill Mitchell)
Provides that
the restrictions on driving a vehicle on the shoulder of a highway do not apply
to any farm tractor or implement of husbandry.
The Illinois Mid-West Truckers Association opposes the bill and the Illinois
Road Contractors Association has requested the bill to be amended to not apply
in construction zones for safety reasons. IFB supports HB 4251. The bill is
assigned to the House Agriculture and Conservation Committee and is posted for a
hearing next week.
If you have questions on these or other
ag legislative items, please contact me at
ccfb@ctitech.com.
Don’t forget to visit
http://www.farmbureaunews.com/coal.htm
for the latest updates on the Taylorville Energy Center and SB 2079.
--------------------------
Current Federal Ag Issues-You can act now!
http://capwiz.com/afb/issues/
American
Farm Bureau Legislative Action Center
http://www.fb.org/index.php?fuseaction=legislative.fbact
CONGRESS
http://thomas.loc.gov/
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
Illinois Farm Bureau Board of
Directors 2008 State Legislative Priorities.
2008 Legislative Priorities Are:
-
Seek passage
of a state budget that maintains all funding levels at acceptable levels to
provide for agricultural programs within the current tax structure.
-
Seek passage
of legislation that requires coal bed methane operators to justly compensate
landowners and owners of rural property when private property is being drilled
upon in the absence of an agreement with the landowner.
-
Seek the
restoration of the U of I Extension Services Youth Educator funding levels to
FY 2007 Budget Levels or greater. This would restore the 29 youth educators
that were eliminated by the Governor’s Line Item Veto in the FY 2008 State
Budget.
-
Seek passage
to make Illinois the top producer of renewable fuels and ensure a direct
demand for Illinois grown commodities.
-
Seek passage
of legislation that allows County Board of Commissioners to increase the
number of elected-at-large commissioners.
-
Seek passage
of legislation to expand the number of counties where statute limits the
distance from a municipality that an annexation agreement will be valid.
-
Seek passage
of legislation that limits a landowner’s liability when the property is used
by invited guests for recreational purposes.
-
Seek passage
of legislation to provide limited liability for agri-tourism and farm animal
activities.
-
Seek passage
of legislation to authorize counties and municipalities to establish local
Purchase of Agricultural Conservation Easement programs to purchase
agricultural conservation easements to encourage farmland preservation.
-
Seek passage
of legislation to require 30 days written notice to all landowners and
governmental entities whose property or district boundary is within 1 ½ miles
of any parcel in an unincorporated area for which a zoning change is proposed
or on which a special use permit is sought.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
State Elected Officials Contact Guide
Governor Rod
Blagojevich
207 Statehouse
Springfield, IL 62706
Phone: (217) 782-0244
Fax: (217) 524-4049
100 W. Randolph St., Ste. 16-100
Chicago, IL 60601-3220
Phone: (312) 814-2121
Fax: (312) 814-6183
State Senator Deanna Demuzio
demuzio@senatedem.state.il.us
<http://capwiz.com/ilfb/mail/?id=152200&type=ST&state=IL>
M106 State Capitol
Springfield, IL 62706
Phone: (217)782-8206
Fax: (217) 854-5311
Main District Office:
140 Carlinville Plaza
Carlinville,
IL 62626
Phone: (217) 854-4441
Fax: (217) 854-5311
Representative Gary Hannig
hanniggl@ilga.gov
<http://capwiz.com/ilfb/mail/?id=3273&type=ST&state=IL>
300 State Capitol
Springfield, IL 62706
Phone: (217) 782-8071
Fax: (217) 524-1794
Main District Office:
218 South Macoupin
Stree, PO Box
8
Gillespie, IL 62033
Phone: (217) 839-2859
Fax: (217) 839-4833
Senator Bill Brady
billbrady@senatorbillbrady.com
<http://capwiz.com/ilfb/mail/?id=10672&type=ST&state=IL>
105D State Capitol
Springfield, IL 62706
Phone: (217) 782-6216
Fax: (217) 782-0116
Main District Office:
2203 Eastland Drive, Suite 3
Bloomington, IL 61704
Phone: (309) 664-4440
Fax: (309) 664-8597
Representative Bill Mitchell
repmitchell@earthlink.net
<http://capwiz.com/ilfb/mail/?id=7866&type=ST&state=IL>
238-W Stratton Building
Springfield, IL 62706
Phone: (217) 782-8163
Fax: (217) 782-1139
Main District Office:
332 West Marion, Suite N-1
Forsyth, IL 62535
Phone: (217) 876-1968
Fax: (217) 876-1973
CHRISTIAN
COUNTY BOARD
JOHN CURTIN, CHAIRMAN
217-824-4011
ccboard@hotmail.com
|